George C. N. Lekelefac
University of Munich

Abstract
This article critically examines the ecclesiological and missiological framework of Januarius Asongu through his forthcoming manuscript Fire From the Margins: World Christianity After Christendom (2026), his recently published Beyond Doctrine: A Critical-Liberative Theology of Faith and Emancipation (Wipf & Stock, 2026), Faith, Power and Emancipation: Liberative Realism and the Ethics of Truth and Freedom (Wipf & Stock, 2026), and his peer-reviewed works on missionary reciprocity and triple masking. The article argues that Asongu’s distinctive contribution lies in collapsing the sharp separation between ecclesiology and missiology that modern theology often created. Rather than treating mission as an activity of the Church, Asongu reconstructs ecclesiology through missiology: the Church can only understand itself correctly once it recognizes that Christianity has become polycentric, migratory, reciprocal, and post-Christendom. Drawing on interviews, access to unpublished manuscripts, and Asongu’s peer-reviewed research on neurodiversity and LGBTQ+ inclusion, the study employs Asongu’s own Critical Synthetic Realism (CSR) and Synthetic Theological Realism (STR) as its methodological framework. The article concludes that Asongu represents a global ecclesiologist working through missiological categories—a framing that positions him as a significant voice for reconstructing the theology of the Church under conditions of global transformation.

Keywords: Asongu, ecclesiology, missiology, polycentric catholicity, missionary reciprocity, synodality, post-Christendom, Liberative Realism, Synthetic Theological Realism, World Christianity, triple masking

Introduction
The twenty-first century Church faces one of the most profound ecclesiological and missiological transitions in Christian history. The collapse of Western Christendom, the demographic transformation of global Christianity, the rise of migration-driven diasporic churches, the fragmentation of political and epistemic authority, and the increasing crisis of institutional legitimacy have destabilized inherited assumptions concerning ecclesial identity, mission, and authority (Bosch, 1991; Casanova, 1994; Murray, 2004; Walls, 1996, 2002). Ecclesiology can no longer proceed as though Christianity remains culturally normative, geographically centered in Europe, or institutionally insulated from the crises of modernity. Missiology can no longer proceed as though mission flows unidirectionally from West to rest.

Within this context, Januarius Asongu advances a significant ecclesiological and missiological framework. His forthcoming manuscript Fire From the Margins: World Christianity After Christendom (2026a) offers a theological diagnosis of the end of Christendom and a vision of the Church as a polycentric communion. His recently published Beyond Doctrine: A Critical-Liberative Theology of Faith and Emancipation (Wipf & Stock, 2026c) supplies the methodological architecture and institutional prescription for this vision. Faith, Power and Emancipation: Liberative Realism and the Ethics of Truth and Freedom (Wipf & Stock, 2026d) develops Liberative Realism as the ethical and political horizon of his ecclesiology. His peer-reviewed article "The Kairos of Missionary Reciprocity" (Ecclesial Futures, 2026b) advances missiological reflection beyond the limitations of "reverse mission" discourse. His peer-reviewed research on "Triple Masking and Mental Health: A Study of the Burden of Identity Management for Autistic LGBTQ+ Christians in Conservative Church Settings" (Journal of Epidemiology and Public Health, 2026g) extends his concern for marginalized voices to the intersection of neurodiversity, sexuality, and faith.

While Asongu’s theology emerges partly from African Catholic experience—formed in Cameroon and trained at St. Thomas Aquinas Major Seminary in Bambui—this article argues that it should not be reduced to a contextual or regional ecclesiology. Rather, Asongu develops a genuinely global ecclesiological and missiological vision intended to interpret Christianity after Christendom. His biography significantly shapes this transnational orientation: although rooted in African Catholicism, he has lived most of his adult life in North America, serving as a catechist and extraordinary minister of the Eucharist in a Delaware parish. His theology emerges from sustained navigation across multiple ecclesial worlds.

This article argues that Asongu’s distinctive contribution lies in collapsing the sharp separation between ecclesiology and missiology that modern theology often created. Traditionally, ecclesiology studied the Church internally—its nature, authority, structure, and sacraments—while missiology studied the Church’s external mission. But Asongu follows and extends the post-Vatican II insight that the Church is missionary by nature: mission is not something the Church does; mission is what the Church is. His framework is fundamentally ecclesiological, but mission becomes the engine through which he reconstructs ecclesiology itself. Asongu argues that the Church can only understand itself correctly once it recognizes that Christianity has become polycentric, migratory, reciprocal, and post-Christendom. This is simultaneously ecclesiology, missiology, and World Christianity theology.

The article proceeds through eight sections: a literature review situating Asongu in ecclesiological and missiological scholarship; a methodology section detailing the use of Critical Synthetic Realism (CSR) and Synthetic Theological Realism (STR); an analysis of the collapse of Christendom as kenosis; an examination of polycentric catholicity as the reconstruction of ecclesiology through missiology; an analysis of missionary reciprocity as the reconstruction of missiology through ecclesiology; a discussion of performative synodality and the crisis of ecclesial reproduction; an examination of Asongu’s integration of neurodiversity, LGBTQ+ inclusion, and triple masking; a critical evaluation; and a conclusion.

Literature Review
Asongu’s project engages with and extends several major streams of contemporary theological discourse. Understanding these streams is essential for situating his distinctive contribution to both ecclesiology and missiology.

World Christianity and the Demographic Shift
The work of Philip Jenkins (2011) documented the dramatic shift of Christianity’s center of gravity from Europe and North America to Africa, Asia, and Latin America. At the beginning of the twentieth century, approximately eighty percent of the world’s Christians lived in Europe and North America. By 2050, that figure is projected to drop to about twenty percent. The typical Christian today is not an aging European in a half-empty cathedral but a young woman in a bustling African parish, a Pentecostal worshipper in a converted warehouse in São Paulo, or a member of an underground house church in Shanghai.

Andrew Walls (1996, 2002) provided the theoretical framework for understanding this shift through his concept of the "serial expansion" of Christianity. Walls argued that Christianity has moved through multiple cultural centers over its history—from Jerusalem to Antioch to Rome to Europe to the Americas and now to Africa and Asia. At each stage, the faith has undergone a process of adaptation in which new expressions emerge while maintaining continuity with the core narrative. Walls introduced a helpful distinction between the "indigenizing principle" (the tendency of Christianity to become rooted in local cultures) and the "pilgrim principle" (the countervailing tendency to transcend any particular culture). Both principles are essential: without indigenization, Christianity remains foreign; without pilgrimage, it becomes captive to whatever culture it inhabits.

Lamin Sanneh (1989, 2003) argued that translation is the distinctive genius of Christian mission. Unlike Islam, which maintains Arabic as the sacred language of revelation, Christianity has insisted that the Gospel can be translated into every language. This translatability means that Christianity is not tied to any particular culture. It can become authentically indigenous wherever it takes root. Sanneh’s work has been enormously influential, though some scholars question whether translation is as intrinsically liberating as Sanneh suggests, noting that missionary translation was often entangled with colonial power structures (Landau, 2018). Asongu engages this critique by insisting on "critical inculturation"—the affirmation that the Gospel can be expressed through indigenous categories combined with the insistence that cultural expressions must be measured against the normative witness of Scripture and the broader tradition.

Dana Robert (2009) traced the history of mission as a global movement, emphasizing the role of indigenous agency. Jehu Hanciles (2008) extended this analysis by examining how African migration is transforming Western Christianity. Afe Adogame (2013) documented the African Christian diaspora as a site of new currents and emerging trends. Asongu builds on these scholars by arguing that the demographic shift is not merely quantitative but qualitative—a transformation in where and how theological and missiological authority is generated.

Communion Ecclesiology and Vatican II
The Second Vatican Council (1962-1965) marked a decisive shift in Catholic ecclesiology. Lumen Gentium, the Dogmatic Constitution on the Church, reoriented ecclesial identity from the Church as "perfect society" (societas perfecta) to the Church as "People of God." This shift signaled a fundamental reorientation: the Church is not a timeless institution descending from heaven fully formed but a pilgrim people journeying through history toward its fulfillment in the Kingdom (Alberigo & Komonchak, 1995-2006).

Yves Congar (1964, 2011) was one of the most influential theologians shaping Vatican II’s ecclesiology. His work on the laity, on tradition, and on reform emphasized that the Church must remain open to renewal and that the whole People of God participates in the life and mission of the Church. Congar insisted that ecclesial reform becomes impossible whenever institutional self-preservation overrides truthfulness and participation. His insistence that the Church is "always in need of reform" (ecclesia semper reformanda) remains a foundational principle for Asongu’s ecclesiology.
Henri de Lubac (2006) grounded ecclesial communion eucharistically. In Corpus Mysticum, he traced how the term "mystical body" shifted from referring to the Eucharist to referring to the Church. De Lubac emphasized that the Eucharist both signifies and creates the Church as the body of Christ. This eucharistic ecclesiology has profound implications for Asongu’s polycentric vision: if the Eucharist makes the Church, then each local eucharistic assembly is not merely a part of the Church but the Church localized.

Joseph Ratzinger (2005), writing both before and after his pontificate as Benedict XVI, emphasized the importance of communion ecclesiology while warning against what he saw as the deconstruction of hierarchical authority. Ratzinger insisted that the local church is not a self-sufficient entity but exists in communion with the universal Church centered on the Bishop of Rome. Asongu engages Ratzinger critically, affirming the importance of the Petrine ministry while arguing for its reconfiguration from unilateral command to relational coordination.

John Zizioulas (1985), the Orthodox metropolitan and theologian, articulated a relational ontology of communion grounded in the theology of the Cappadocian Fathers. Zizioulas argued that personhood is not something individuals possess in isolation but is constituted through relationship. The Church, as the icon of the Trinity, is a communion of persons whose unity does not erase distinction. This relational ontology provides theological depth to Asongu’s polycentric vision.
Walter Kasper (2004) emphasized that the universal Church is not a federation of local churches but is concretely present in and through them. Kasper’s work on the relationship between the universal Church and the local church—often summarized in the formula "the universal Church is in and from the local churches, the local churches are in and from the universal Church"—provides a conceptual resource for Asongu’s polycentric catholicity.

Miroslav Volf (1998) proposed an anti-exclusionary ecclesiology in After Our Likeness. A Protestant theologian writing in dialogue with Catholic and Orthodox traditions, Volf argued for a vision of the Church as a "catholic community of love" in which unity is not uniformity but the mutual recognition of distinct identities. Volf’s work has been particularly influential for Asongu’s understanding of how unity can be sustained without erasing difference.

Missiology and the Missio Dei
David Bosch (1991) provided a comprehensive overview of paradigm shifts in the theology of mission. Bosch traced how mission has been understood across Christian history—from the early church’s apocalyptic orientation to the medieval crusading model to the Reformation’s emphasis on word and sacrament to the modern colonial mission movement. Bosch proposed an emerging ecumenical paradigm characterized by mission as missio Dei (God’s mission, within which the Church’s mission participates), contextualization, liberation, and dialogue. Bosch’s work is essential for understanding Asongu’s missiological framework.

Lesslie Newbigin (1989) argued that the Church is a "hermeneutic of the Gospel"—the community through which the Gospel is interpreted and embodied. Newbigin insisted that mission is not an optional activity of the Church but constitutive of its identity. This insight directly informs Asongu’s collapsing of the ecclesiology-missiology divide. Newbigin’s experience as a missionary bishop in India shaped his understanding that Western Christendom was ending and that the Church in the West needed to learn from the Church in the Global South.

Stephen Bevans and Roger Schroeder (2004) developed a model of "prophetic dialogue" for mission, emphasizing that the Church speaks and listens, proclaims and receives, challenges and learns. This model resists both the imperialism of a Christianity that imposes its forms without adaptation and the relativism of a Christianity that loses its distinctive identity. Asongu extends this model through his concept of missionary reciprocity.

Postcolonial and Liberation Theologies
Gustavo Gutiérrez (1973, 1984) provided the foundational articulation of liberation theology. A Peruvian priest who worked in the barrios of Lima, Gutiérrez insisted that theology must begin with the lived experience of the poor and oppressed. His famous definition—"theology is critical reflection on Christian praxis in the light of the Word of God"—reoriented theological method toward engagement with historical struggle. Gutiérrez articulated the "preferential option for the poor" as a theological principle, not merely an ethical stance.

Leonardo Boff (1985, 1988) extended liberation theology’s critique to ecclesial structures. In Church: Charism and Power, Boff argued that the Church’s own structures of authority can become "sinful structures" when they prioritize institutional preservation over prophetic witness. Boff’s work on base ecclesial communities (comunidades eclesiales de base) emphasized how lay-led communities reading Scripture together could generate theological insight from the margins.

Jon Sobrino (1993, 1994) developed the concept of the "crucified peoples"—those whose suffering mirrors the unjust death of Jesus. Sobrino argued that the cross reveals not only God’s love but also "the sinful mechanisms that crucify peoples." This insight is central to Asongu’s understanding of the margins as theological sites.

Kwok Pui-lan (2005, 2021) brought postcolonial critique to feminist theology. Kwok argues that theology must be done from multiple locations, resisting the dominance of Western frameworks. Colonial power operated not only through political and economic control but also through the imposition of knowledge systems that marginalized indigenous voices. Liberation therefore requires not only political transformation but also epistemic decolonization—a theme Asongu develops through his concept of epistemic fracture.

Jean-Marc Ela (1986, 1988) offered an African liberation theology grounded in the lived experience of rural Cameroonian communities. Ela argued that the African Church risks becoming "a fortress of silence," preferring institutional harmony to genuine conversion. His critique of ecclesial elitism in Africa—where clergy often live far more comfortably than their congregations—mirrors Asongu’s own observations.

Engelbert Mveng (1985, 1988) developed the concept of "anthropological poverty"—the dehumanization inflicted by colonial and neocolonial systems that strip African peoples of their cultural and spiritual identity. Mveng argued that liberation must address not only material poverty but also the theft of humanity itself.

Mercy Amba Oduyoye (1995, 2001) pioneered African women’s theology, arguing that African culture and the Church both marginalize women, creating a "double jeopardy." Oduyoye insists that salvation in Christ must include full humanity for women, not partial inclusion.

James Cone (1970, 1975) developed Black liberation theology in the United States, arguing that Christian theology must confront structures of racial domination. Cone famously declared that "God is Black"—meaning God identifies with those crushed by white supremacy.

Synodality and Ecclesial Reform
Pope Francis has made synodality a central theme of his pontificate (Francis, 2013, 2018). In Evangelii Gaudium, Francis called for a "conversion of the papacy" and a "healthy decentralization" that allows local churches greater freedom. The Synod on Synodality (2021-2024) represented an attempt to institutionalize this vision, gathering input from Catholics around the world and structuring the process around listening and dialogue rather than simply hierarchical command. The Synod’s Final Document states that synodality is "a constitutive dimension of the Church."

Massimo Faggioli (2012, 2020) has analyzed the reception of Vatican II and the struggle over its meaning. Faggioli argues that the Council’s vision of a Church engaged with the modern world, committed to dialogue, and structured around participation has been repeatedly challenged by movements seeking to return to preconciliar forms. Asongu’s critique of performative synodality extends Faggioli’s analysis.

Rafael Luciani (2022) has developed a theological framework for synodality rooted in Latin American ecclesial experience. Luciani emphasizes that synodality is not merely a procedure but a way of being Church that requires the conversion of all members, including the hierarchy.

Neurodiversity, LGBTQ+ Inclusion, and Ecclesial Reform
A distinctive and often overlooked dimension of Asongu’s corpus is his engagement with neurodiversity and mental health. His peer-reviewed article "Triple Masking and Mental Health: A Study of the Burden of Identity Management for Autistic LGBTQ+ Christians in Conservative Church Settings" (Journal of Epidemiology and Public Health, 2026g) introduces and empirically validates the construct of "triple masking": the concurrent concealment of neurotype, sexual/gender identity, and theological doubt by autistic LGBTQ+ individuals within conservative Christian settings.

This research engages with the growing literature on intersectionality (Crenshaw, 1989), minority stress theory (Meyer, 2003), and syndemic vulnerability (Meyer, 2017). It demonstrates that intersectional stress operates multiplicatively, not additively, creating compounded vulnerability. The study’s mixed-methods design (N = 188 for quantitative phase; n = 10 for qualitative phase) provides empirical grounding for Asongu’s ecclesiological claims about the margins.

Asongu’s Distinctive Contribution
Asongu’s distinctive contribution lies in synthesizing these diverse streams into a coherent framework that collapses the sharp separation between ecclesiology and missiology. He is not merely a compiler of other theologians’ insights but a constructive thinker who uses mission to rethink the structure and identity of the Church. One could position Asongu academically as a global ecclesiologist working through missiological categories. This framing is stronger than "African theologian," "contextual theologian," or merely "missiologist" because his project is ultimately about reconstructing the theology of the Church itself under conditions of global transformation. Ecclesiology is the destination; missiology is the methodological pathway.

Methodology
This study employs a qualitative constructive-theological methodology grounded in Januarius Asongu’s broader philosophical framework of Critical Synthetic Realism (CSR) and its theological extension, Synthetic Theological Realism (STR) . CSR and STR function not merely as the subject of analysis but also as interpretive methodological lenses.

As a philosophical framework, CSR emphasizes three interconnected pillars. The critical dimension affirms radical fallibilism, acknowledging the provisionality of all knowledge claims and the necessity of ongoing critique. The synthetic dimension emphasizes integrative reasoning that bridges diverse disciplines, traditions, and perspectives. The realist dimension affirms a mind-independent, stratified reality while recognizing that human access to that reality is historically, institutionally, culturally, psychologically, and epistemically mediated (Asongu, 2026f).

Synthetic Theological Realism extends CSR into the theological domain. It affirms that God is real and not reducible to human constructs, that divine truth is not a projection of social or historical forces, yet human access to divine truth is mediated through history, language, and interpretation. STR rejects both theological absolutism (the assumption that particular doctrinal formulations possess final and unchallengeable certainty) and theological relativism (the reduction of theology to culturally contingent narratives). STR affirms instead that theology is both truthful and mediated: revelation does not bypass history but is encountered within it (Asongu, 2026c, Chapter 2).

This dual commitment—realism about truth and humility about human knowledge—shapes the methodological orientation of this study. The methodological orientation reflects CSR’s rejection of reductionism. Asongu’s ecclesiology and missiology are therefore interpreted not solely as doctrinal systems but as multidimensional frameworks operating simultaneously at sacramental, institutional, epistemological, historical, postcolonial, missionary, and civilizational levels.

The study proceeds through constructive-critical engagement with multiple layers of Asongu’s intellectual corpus. The primary sources include:

First, Asongu’s forthcoming manuscript Fire From the Margins: World Christianity After Christendom (2026a), which functions as the central ecclesiological text. This work remains in manuscript form and has not yet been formally published. It presents a theological diagnosis of the end of Christendom through the lens of kenosis and articulates the vision of polycentric catholicity.

Second, Asongu’s recently published works, including Beyond Doctrine: A Critical-Liberative Theology of Faith and Emancipation (Wipf & Stock, 2026c), Faith, Power and Emancipation: Liberative Realism and the Ethics of Truth and Freedom (Wipf & Stock, 2026d), The Splendor of Truth: A Critical Philosophy of Knowledge and Global Agency (Wipf & Stock, 2026e), and Critical Synthetic Realism: A Systematic Philosophy of Truth, Personhood, and Human Flourishing (Generis Publishing, 2026f). These works provide the philosophical and theological architecture for Asongu’s ecclesiological and missiological vision.

Third, Asongu’s peer-reviewed journal article "The Kairos of Missionary Reciprocity: Beyond 'Reverse Mission' Toward a Polycentric Catholicism," published in Ecclesial Futures (Volume 7, Issue 1, 2026, pp. 5–21). This article represents Asongu’s most developed published statement on missiology.

Fourth, Asongu’s peer-reviewed research on "Triple Masking and Mental Health: A Study of the Burden of Identity Management for Autistic LGBTQ+ Christians in Conservative Church Settings" (Journal of Epidemiology and Public Health, 2026g), which extends his ecclesiological concern for marginalized voices to neurodiversity and LGBTQ+ inclusion.

Fifth, Asongu’s online theological publications, essays, public reflections, and blog materials published through Asongu Books, which provide insight into the evolving and applied dimensions of his ecclesiology.

Sixth, data derived from multiple formal and informal interviews and extended theological conversations with the author, which were particularly important for clarifying conceptual ambiguities, reconstructing the developmental trajectory of Asongu’s thought, and identifying themes not yet systematically articulated in published works.

The article does not simply summarize Asongu’s thought but critically reconstructs it through sustained engagement with contemporary ecclesiological and missiological scholarship, placing Asongu in dialogue with the major figures surveyed in the literature review. This dialogical method reflects CSR’s emphasis on knowledge growth through critique and synthesis.

The Collapse of Christendom as Kenosis
The foundation of Asongu’s ecclesiology and missiology lies in his interpretation of the collapse of Christendom. For Asongu, Christendom refers not simply to medieval Europe but to the broader civilizational arrangement in which Christianity functioned as culturally normative, politically privileged, socially hegemonic, and institutionally secure (Asongu, 2026a). This arrangement was not the necessary expression of Christian faith but a historically contingent synthesis of theology, power, and culture.

In Fire From the Margins, Asongu argues that the decline of Christendom should not be interpreted merely as ecclesial catastrophe. Rather, it represents an ecclesiological purification exposing the difference between Christianity sustained by cultural inheritance and Christianity sustained by existential participation. Drawing on the concept of kenosis from Philippians 2:6-11, Asongu argues that the loss of cultural dominance can be understood as a form of conformity to Christ, who "emptied himself, taking the form of a slave."

This kenotic interpretation of Christendom’s collapse marks a significant departure from both lamentation and celebration. Some Catholic traditionalists mourn the loss of Christendom as a fall from grace, treating the Constantinian settlement as the normative expression of Christianity. Some secularists celebrate the collapse as liberation from religious domination. Asongu rejects both framings: the end of Christendom is neither tragedy nor triumph but kairos—an opportunity for the Church to recover dimensions of its identity obscured by centuries of cultural dominance.

The Augsburg–Kumbo comparison in Fire From the Margins symbolizes this transition. Augsburg Cathedral represents the monumental memory of Christendom: theological refinement, historical continuity, architectural grandeur, and liturgical precision. Yet it stands nearly empty. Kumbo Cathedral in Cameroon, by contrast, lacks Christendom’s accumulated prestige yet overflows with participatory worship, embodied liturgy, communal faith, and sacramental vitality. As Asongu writes: "Augsburg has not failed. It has endured. But endurance is not the same as vitality. It is the difference between a heartbeat and an echo."

This comparison invites dialogue with Charles Taylor’s (2007) analysis of the secular age. Taylor argues that the shift to secularity is not simply a matter of declining belief but a transformation in the conditions of belief. In the pre-modern West, belief in God was "naïve" in the sense that it was the taken-for-granted framework of experience. In the modern West, belief and unbelief are both live options. Asongu extends Taylor’s insight by showing that the same transformation is occurring ecclesially: Christian identity is no longer inherited by default but chosen amid cost. The Church in the post-Christendom West is learning what the Church in much of the Global South has always known.

Asongu reads the Second Vatican Council not as a concession to modernity but as a retrieval of resources within the tradition that had been obscured by the Christendom synthesis. Lumen Gentium’s shift from the Church as "perfect society" to the Church as "People of God" reorients ecclesial identity toward movement rather than stability. Gaudium et Spes’s insistence that the Church "scrutinize the signs of the times" assumes that the Holy Spirit is already active in history. Ad Gentes’s teaching on mission as inculturation undermines the assumption that Western expressions of Christianity are normative.

Asongu argues that these developments point toward a kenotic ecclesiology: the Church’s identity is not secured by power but by participation in Christ’s self-emptying. "A Church that seeks to preserve its influence at all costs," he writes, "risks missing the pattern of the Gospel. A Church that embraces vulnerability as a mode of witness may discover dimensions of faithfulness that were obscured when it occupied the center."

This kenotic ecclesiology resonates with Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s (1959) reflections on the Church as a community of disciples willing to suffer for truth. It also echoes John Howard Yoder’s (1994) argument that the New Testament presents a fundamentally political understanding of the Gospel: Jesus is Lord—a claim that directly challenged the lordship of Caesar. The Church’s task is not to gain power over society but to witness faithfully to the reign of God.

Polycentric Catholicity: Reconstructing Ecclesiology Through Missiology
The central category of Asongu’s ecclesiological and missiological framework is polycentric catholicity. In "The Kairos of Missionary Reciprocity" (Ecclesial Futures, 2026b), Asongu critiques the language of "reverse mission" because it continues to assume Europe as Christianity’s normative center.

According to Asongu, the language of "reverse mission" preserves colonial ecclesiological architecture. It assumes that mission properly flows from the West outward and that missionary activity from Africa, Asia, or Latin America toward Europe merely reverses the original direction. The very term "reverse" implies a normative direction—a center from which mission normally radiates.

Asongu argues that this language, however well-intentioned, remains trapped within the very framework it seeks to overcome. Against this framework, Asongu proposes polycentric catholicity.
Polycentric catholicity means: theological and missiological creativity emerges from multiple centers, no civilization monopolizes Christian meaning, every local church possesses missionary agency, and communion replaces unilateral ecclesial control. As Asongu writes in Fire From the Margins:

"The Church no longer operates credibly as a single cultural center disseminating norms to passive peripheries. She is increasingly manifest as a communion of multiple centers—diverse in history and expression, yet held together by shared faith, sacramental life, and mutual accountability. This is not fragmentation, but catholicity disentangled from imperial inheritance."

This proposal is simultaneously ecclesiological and missiological. Ecclesiologically, it reconfigures the structure, authority, and unity of the Church. No longer can the Church be imagined as a pyramid with a single apex (Rome) radiating authority outward to passive peripheries. Instead, the Church is a network of interdependent centers, each fully Church, each contributing to the whole. Missiologically, it reconfigures the flow, direction, and agency of mission. No longer can mission be imagined as a one-way flow from sending to receiving churches. Instead, mission is multidirectional, reciprocal, and mutual.

The two cannot be separated because the Church is missionary by nature. As Lumen Gentium teaches, the Church is "missionary by its very nature" (Lumen Gentium, §16). Asongu takes this insight to its logical conclusion: if the Church is missionary by nature, then ecclesiology cannot be done without missiology, and missiology cannot be done without ecclesiology. They are two dimensions of a single reality.

Asongu’s polycentric vision develops Vatican II’s communion ecclesiology while extending it beyond its largely European reception. Yves Congar emphasized reform through participation and local ecclesial vitality. Henri de Lubac grounded ecclesial communion eucharistically. John Zizioulas articulated a relational ontology of communion. Miroslav Volf proposed an anti-exclusionary ecclesiology. Asongu receives these insights but relocates them within the realities of World Christianity and transnational migration. For Congar and de Lubac, the local church was primarily the diocese as a territorial unit within a European Christendom. For Asongu, the local church is whatever community of the baptized gathers around the Eucharist—whether in a Cameroonian village, a Brazilian favela, a Korean house church, or a Delaware parish.

In a polycentric Church, authority cannot function as it did under Christendom. Authority is no longer understood as the unilateral exercise of power from a fixed center but as a dynamic process of coordination among multiple centers. The Church begins to resemble a network rather than a pyramid. Importantly, Asongu does not advocate fragmentation or relativism. Rome remains indispensable as a center of communion and continuity. As he writes: "Rome remains indispensable as a center of communion and continuity. At the same time, the future cannot be sustained by the center alone." However, Rome can no longer function credibly as the sole epistemic center of global Catholicism. The Petrine ministry is essential as a focus of unity, but it is exercised in service of communion, not in replacement of local discernment.

This reconceptualization of papal authority resonates with Pope Francis’s call for a "healthy decentralization" and his image of the Church as a polyhedron rather than a sphere (Francis, 2013). A polyhedron has many faces, each distinct, yet all united in a single form. This contrasts with a sphere, which absorbs all difference into a smooth uniformity. The Church, Francis suggests, is a polyhedron, not a sphere.

Asongu refuses to romanticize the Global South. His critical examinations of prosperity theology, the deliverance industry, and the concentration of authority in charismatic leaders demonstrate genuine theological integrity. He engages the work of scholars who have documented the problematic dimensions of African Pentecostalism, including Paul Gifford (2004, 2015) on prosperity-oriented Christianity, Ruth Marshall (2009) on charismatic authority, and Birgit Meyer (1999, 2015) on deliverance ministries. Yet he also draws on scholars who emphasize indigenous agency and theological creativity, such as Ogbu Kalu (2008), Kwame Bediako (1995), and Allan Anderson (2014). He calls instead for "critical inculturation"—the affirmation that the Gospel can be expressed through indigenous categories, combined with the insistence that cultural expressions must be measured against the normative witness of Scripture and the broader tradition.

Missionary Reciprocity: Reconstructing Missiology Through Ecclesiology
If polycentric catholicity is Asongu’s central ecclesiological category, missionary reciprocity is his central missiological category. Developed in his Ecclesial Futures article (Asongu, 2026b) and extended in Faith, Power and Emancipation (2026d), missionary reciprocity flows directly from polycentric catholicity.

Missionary reciprocity entails: mutual evangelization, intercultural theological exchange, reciprocal correction, transnational ecclesial solidarity, and shared participation in the missio Dei. This framework develops David Bosch’s multidirectional theology of mission while extending it into ecclesial structure itself. Where Bosch focused on missiological paradigms, Asongu focuses on ecclesial architecture: how does the Church organize itself to enable genuine reciprocity rather than merely reversing the direction of one-way mission?

Drawing from his own transnational and diasporic experience, Asongu argues that migration itself has become an ecclesiological and missiological event. Diaspora Christianity reshapes not only demographics but the structure of catholicity and the flow of mission. Every church is simultaneously missionary and missionized. Europe evangelized Africa, but African diasporic communities now revitalize European and North American Catholicism. Asian minority churches model perseverance. Latin American Catholicism reshapes worship and ecclesial participation across North America.

Asongu’s diasporic ecclesiology and missiology recognize that migration is not merely a pastoral challenge to be managed but a theological resource to be received. The migrant is not only a recipient of charity but a bearer of the Gospel. The diaspora church is not merely an ethnic enclave but a site of theological creativity and missionary agency. This perspective resonates with the work of Jehu Hanciles (2008) on African migration and the transformation of Western Christianity, and with Afe Adogame (2013) on the African Christian diaspora.

The concept of missionary reciprocity has profound implications for how the Church organizes itself. Territorial parishes organized around stable residential communities may no longer be sufficient. The Church must develop structures capable of accompanying mobile populations, sustaining faith across borders, and receiving gifts from diverse cultural traditions. This requires what Asongu calls a "decentering" of missionary formation: seminaries must train priests for intercultural ministry not as an add-on but as central to pastoral formation.

Asongu draws on the work of scholars of migration and religion, including Peggy Levitt (2001) on transnational religious networks, and Robert Schreiter (1997) on the new catholicity. He also engages the Vatican’s documents on migration, particularly Pope Francis’s repeated calls for a Church that is welcoming, protecting, promoting, and integrating migrants.

Missionary reciprocity also has implications for theological education. If theology is no longer produced in a single center and exported to peripheries, then seminaries in the Global North must teach theologies from the Global South not as elective additions but as core curriculum. African theologians such as Kwame Bediako, John Mbiti, and Mercy Amba Oduyoye must be read alongside Augustine and Aquinas. Conversely, seminaries in the Global South must engage the Western theological tradition critically rather than simply reproducing it.

Performative Synodality and the Crisis of Ecclesial Reproduction
Perhaps Asongu’s most original contribution to ecclesiology lies in his critique of synodality’s institutional implementation. Unlike many contemporary theological treatments that celebrate synodality primarily in aspirational terms, Asongu raises a more difficult question: can genuinely synodal structures emerge from ecclesial systems whose leadership cultures were themselves formed within fundamentally non-synodal patterns of governance?

This concern becomes especially visible in Asongu’s reflections on ecclesial realities within the Bamenda Ecclesiastical Province in Cameroon, as revealed through interviews and his unpublished theological manuscripts. His critique is not directed against synodality itself. On the contrary, Asongu strongly supports synodal ecclesiology as a necessary consequence of polycentric catholicity. Rather, his concern is that much contemporary synodality risks becoming performative rather than transformative.

By "performative synodality," Asongu refers to ecclesial situations in which the language of listening, discernment, participation, and dialogue is publicly celebrated while institutional structures remain fundamentally centralized, clerical, opaque, and resistant to criticism. This critique resonates strongly with Pope Francis’s repeated condemnation of clericalism as one of the Church’s gravest pathologies. Francis has stated that "clericalism is a perversion of the Church" that creates conditions for abuse and cover-up.

Asongu radicalizes this critique by locating the problem within structures of ecclesial reproduction itself. Leadership within many ecclesiastical systems, he argues, continues to emerge through cultures shaped by: hierarchical insulation, obedience-based formation, risk aversion, institutional conformity, and clerical paternalism. Consequently, even leaders who sincerely affirm synodality may unconsciously reproduce fundamentally non-synodal modes of governance because those structures shaped their own ecclesial imagination. They know no other way of being Church.

This insight draws on Pierre Bourdieu’s (1977) concept of habitus—the deeply ingrained habits, skills, and dispositions that individuals acquire through their socialization within particular structures. A bishop formed in a seminary culture that rewarded obedience over inquiry, conformity over creativity, and deference over critique will carry those dispositions into his episcopal ministry, regardless of his verbal commitment to synodality. The problem is not bad will but the weight of formation.

This critique becomes particularly acute in postcolonial ecclesial contexts where episcopal structures often inherited not only sacramental authority but also bureaucratic and administrative habits rooted partly in colonial governance systems. Mahmood Mamdani (1996) has documented how colonial states in Africa created structures of authority that were not transformed into accountable institutions at independence. Asongu extends this analysis to ecclesial structures: the Church in Africa sometimes inherited the administrative habits of colonial governance, including centralized authority, limited transparency, and hierarchical distance.

Here Asongu intersects significantly with Johann Baptist Metz’s (1980) critique of bourgeois Christianity and dangerous memory, as well as Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s (1959) critique of institutional self-protection. Metz argued that the Church must preserve the "dangerous memory" of suffering that modern societies suppress. Bonhoeffer insisted that the Church must be willing to "jam the wheel" of injustice rather than merely bandaging its victims. Asongu reframes these concerns through his broader category of epistemic fracture, developed extensively in The Splendor of Truth (2026e) and Faith, Power and Emancipation (2026d).

The problem is not merely structural inefficiency. Ecclesial institutions themselves can become epistemically closed—incapable of hearing uncomfortable truths because institutional cultures reward conformity and discourage parrhesia (courageous speech). In such contexts, synodality risks becoming symbolic performance without structural consequence. Listening sessions produce reports that are never acted upon. Consultations generate recommendations that are ignored. The form of synodality is preserved while its substance is evacuated.

Beyond Doctrine provides concrete institutional mechanisms to address this crisis: public financial audits of dioceses, independent lay-led financial councils, clear canonical processes for addressing episcopal misconduct, mandatory reporting of abuse to civil authorities, lay participation in episcopal appointment processes, term limits or functional accountability for bishops, and the elevation of women to genuine decision-making roles. These proposals align with the work of ecclesial reform scholars such as Thomas Doyle (2006) on clericalism and Donald Cozzens (2000) on the crisis of priestly identity.

Asongu insists that authentic synodality requires more than assemblies, consultations, or ecclesial vocabulary. It requires institutional conversion, new forms of leadership formation, cultures of accountability, theological reciprocity, and ecclesial vulnerability. This insight constitutes one of the strongest dimensions of his ecclesiology because it identifies a central paradox facing the contemporary Church: synodality is often being implemented by ecclesial systems formed precisely within the non-synodal conditions synodality seeks to overcome.

Triple Masking, Neurodiversity, and the Expansion of the Margins
A distinctive and often overlooked dimension of Asongu’s corpus is his engagement with neurodiversity and mental health. His peer-reviewed research on "Triple Masking and Mental Health" (Journal of Epidemiology and Public Health, 2026g) introduces and empirically validates the construct of "triple masking": the concurrent concealment of neurotype, sexual/gender identity, and theological doubt by autistic LGBTQ+ individuals within conservative Christian settings.

The study employs a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design. The quantitative phase (N = 188) used validated measures of anxiety, depression, and minority stress, along with a newly developed Triple Masking Index (TMI). The qualitative phase (n = 10) involved semi-structured interviews with participants who had completed the survey, allowing for deeper exploration of the lived experience of triple masking.

Results reveal that the Triple Masking Index (TMI) is a strong predictor of both anxiety (R² = .47) and depression (R² = .43), explaining more variance than individual masking constructs. This is statistically significant: the combined effect of masking multiple identities is greater than the sum of its parts. Thematic analysis of interview data identifies three central experiences:

First, identity fission: the experience of living as multiple, fragmented selves rather than an integrated whole. Participants described switching between different presentations of self depending on context—masking autistic traits in some settings, masking LGBTQ+ identity in others, masking theological doubt in still others. Over time, this fragmentation produced a sense of not knowing which self was "real."

Second, environmental amplification: the church as a multi-threat space where multiple sources of potential rejection converge. For autistic LGBTQ+ Christians, conservative church settings are not merely unwelcoming in one dimension but in several dimensions simultaneously. The sensory environment may be overwhelming (amplifying autistic vulnerability), the teaching on sexuality may be condemnatory (amplifying LGBTQ+ vulnerability), and the requirement of doctrinal certainty may foreclose theological questioning (amplifying doubt).

Third, subversive faith and digital resilience: adaptive coping through alternative spiritual communities. Participants who could not find affirmation in their local congregations often turned to online communities—social media groups, podcasts, blogs—where they could express their full selves without masking. These digital spaces became sites of what participants called "subversive faith": remaining Christian on their own terms, often in tension with institutional authority.

The findings substantiate the theory that intersectional stress operates multiplicatively, not additively, creating what Meyer (2017) calls "syndemic vulnerability." For autistic LGBTQ+ Christians, the combination of neurodivergence, sexual/gender minority status, and religious minority status within conservative settings produces a unique form of compounded marginalization that cannot be understood by examining each identity in isolation.

This research extends Asongu’s ecclesiological concern for the margins to populations often overlooked even within LGBTQ+ advocacy. It demonstrates empirically what his theology argues normatively: that the Church’s failure to affirm marginalized identities causes real, measurable harm. The study’s implications for ecclesial reform are significant: churches must become affirming spaces not only for LGBTQ+ identity but for neurodiversity as well. This means reconsidering sensory environments (lighting, noise, seating), liturgical practices (flexibility, predictability), and educational programs (multiple learning styles, acceptance of doubt).

Asongu’s integration of empirical research with theological reflection is methodologically significant. It demonstrates that his commitment to the margins is not merely rhetorical but operationalized through rigorous social science. This aligns with CSR’s emphasis on knowledge growth through interdisciplinary engagement and STR’s insistence that theology must remain accountable to lived experience.

Critical Evaluation
Asongu’s ecclesiological and missiological framework offers several major strengths that warrant recognition.

First, he successfully collapses the sharp separation between ecclesiology and missiology that modern theology often created. His framework is fundamentally ecclesiological, but mission becomes the engine through which he reconstructs ecclesiology itself. This positions him as a global ecclesiologist working through missiological categories—a framing that captures the synthetic character of his thought.

Second, his concept of polycentric catholicity offers one of the clearest theological articulations of Christianity’s global future without collapsing into relativism or fragmentation. It provides a positive vision rather than merely a critique of Christendom. The term "polycentric catholicity" names something real: the emerging structure of global Christianity as a network of interdependent centers rather than a pyramid with a single apex.

Third, his theology of missionary reciprocity significantly advances contemporary missiology by overcoming colonial center–periphery assumptions. It provides a framework for understanding missionary mobility that is both theologically grounded and pastorally relevant. The concept of "missionary reciprocity" is an improvement over "reverse mission" because it affirms the dignity and agency of all churches rather than merely reversing a colonial flow.

Fourth, his critique of performative synodality represents a major ecclesiological intervention. Few contemporary theologians have analyzed so directly the contradiction between synodal rhetoric and the persistence of non-synodal ecclesial cultures. Asongu names a problem that many have experienced but few have articulated with such precision.

Fifth, his research on triple masking extends ecclesial concern for marginalized voices to neurodiverse and autistic LGBTQ+ populations, demonstrating empirically that his commitment to the margins is not merely rhetorical. The mixed-methods design provides evidence for the real harm caused by non-affirming ecclesial environments.

Sixth, Faith, Power and Emancipation provides a political theology that integrates liberationist urgency with institutional realism, offering a framework for responsible political action that avoids both revolutionary utopianism and cynical resignation. The five principles of Liberative Realism—epistemic integrity, human dignity, nonviolent moral discipline, institutional responsibility, and strategic realism—provide a normative framework for evaluating liberation movements.

Seventh, his philosophical framework of CSR and STR provides an epistemology capable of holding together the objectivity of truth and the necessity of contextual discernment. Without this philosophical grounding, polycentric ecclesiology risks collapsing into relativism or fragmentation.

Nevertheless, several tensions remain that require further attention.

First, while Beyond Doctrine provides institutional mechanisms for transparency and accountability, the transition from centralized to polycentric governance remains undertheorized. How are resistant structures to be overcome? What coalitions are necessary? What is the timeline? Asongu offers direction but not a political strategy. He identifies the problem of performative synodality but does not fully specify how to move from performance to authentic practice.

Second, the relationship between polycentric catholicity and papal primacy requires further elaboration. Asongu affirms that Rome remains indispensable, and he argues for a reconfigured papacy exercised synodally. But the precise mechanisms for resolving disagreements between local churches and Rome—or between local churches themselves—remain underspecified. This is not a fatal flaw, but it is an area requiring further development.

Third, a fuller polycentric ecclesiology would require more sustained engagement with Orthodox, Anglican, and Pentecostal understandings of the Church. Asongu engages Volf and Hauerwas but the emphasis remains on Catholic ecclesiology. The Church is not only Catholic but ecumenical, and a truly polycentric vision must account for the diversity of ecclesial traditions.

Fourth, while Asongu’s empirical research on triple masking is methodologically sophisticated, his claims about missionary reciprocity would benefit from similar empirical grounding. Interviews with African priests serving in Western dioceses, or with Western missionaries serving in the Global South, would test and refine the concept of missionary reciprocity against lived experience.

Fifth, Asongu’s claims about the epistemological privilege of the margins require more precise specification. Does he claim that marginalized communities cannot err? Does he claim that their perspectives are always corrective? Or does he claim only that their experiences must be included in theological discernment? The text suggests the latter, but the rhetoric sometimes suggests the former.

Conclusion
Januarius Asongu has produced a substantial corpus that constitutes one of the most ambitious ecclesiological and missiological projects in contemporary theology. Fire From the Margins offers a compelling diagnosis of the end of Christendom as a kenotic moment and a vision of the Church as a polycentric communion. Beyond Doctrine supplies the methodological architecture and institutional prescription, including substantive treatments of gender, sexuality, clerical celibacy, LGBTQ+ inclusion, and ecological justice. Faith, Power and Emancipation provides the ethical horizon of Liberative Realism, integrating liberationist urgency with institutional realism. His peer-reviewed work on missionary reciprocity advances missiological reflection beyond "reverse mission" discourse. His research on triple masking extends ecclesial concern to neurodiverse and autistic LGBTQ+ populations, demonstrating empirically the harm caused by non-affirming ecclesial environments.

Asongu’s distinctive contribution lies in collapsing the sharp separation between ecclesiology and missiology. He argues that the Church can only understand itself correctly once it recognizes that Christianity has become polycentric, migratory, reciprocal, and post-Christendom. This is simultaneously ecclesiology, missiology, and World Christianity theology. Ecclesiology is the destination; missiology is the methodological pathway. To position Asongu academically: he is a global ecclesiologist working through missiological categories—a framing that captures the synthetic character of his thought and his significance for reconstructing the theology of the Church under conditions of global transformation.

Most significantly, Asongu’s critique of performative synodality identifies one of the deepest ecclesiological crises facing the contemporary Church: the attempt to implement synodality through leadership cultures still fundamentally shaped by non-synodal structures of authority and institutional reproduction. This diagnosis is both courageous and necessary. It names a contradiction that many experience but few articulate with such clarity.

The open questions identified above are not fatal flaws. They are, rather, the marks of a work in progress—a theological project that has identified the right questions but has not yet fully developed its answers. Asongu has given us a compelling vision and a substantial architecture. The task now is to test it against the messy realities of institutional power, to integrate the voices that remain marginal even within his account of the margins, and to develop the political theology of transition that his work implicitly requires.

Asongu writes from within the ecclesial reality he describes: a lay theologian formed in African Catholicism, serving in a Delaware parish, navigating multiple ecclesial worlds. His voice is not that of an institutional insider nor of an alienated critic, but of someone who loves the Church enough to critique it and critiques it in the hope of its renewal. This is a rare and valuable stance.
The fire from the margins is spreading. Asongu has given us tools for understanding it. Whether the Church has the courage to follow it remains an open question.

References
Adogame, A. (2013). The African Christian diaspora: New currents and emerging trends in world Christianity. Bloomsbury.
Alberigo, G., & Komonchak, J. A. (Eds.). (1995-2006). History of Vatican II (5 vols.). Orbis Books.
Anderson, A. (2014). An introduction to Pentecostalism: Global charismatic Christianity (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Asongu, J. (2026a). Fire from the margins: World Christianity after Christendom. [Forthcoming manuscript].
Asongu, J. (2026b). The kairos of missionary reciprocity: Beyond "reverse mission" toward a polycentric Catholicism. Ecclesial Futures, 7(1), 5–21.
Asongu, J. (2026c). Beyond doctrine: A critical-liberative theology of faith and emancipation. Wipf & Stock.
Asongu, J. (2026d). Faith, power and emancipation: Liberative realism and the ethics of truth and freedom. Wipf & Stock.
Asongu, J. (2026e). The splendor of truth: A critical philosophy of knowledge and global agency. Wipf & Stock.
Asongu, J. (2026f). Critical synthetic realism: A systematic philosophy of truth, personhood, and human flourishing. Generis Publishing.
Asongu, J. (2026g). Triple masking and mental health: A study of the burden of identity management for autistic LGBTQ+ Christians in conservative church settings. Journal of Epidemiology and Public Health.
Bediako, K. (1995). Christianity in Africa: The renewal of a non-Western religion. Edinburgh University Press.
Bevans, S. B., & Schroeder, R. P. (2004). Constants in context: A theology of mission for today. Orbis Books.
Boff, L. (1985). Church: Charism and power: Liberation theology and the institutional church. Wipf & Stock.
Boff, L. (1988). Ecclesiogenesis: The base communities reinvent the church. Orbis Books.
Bonhoeffer, D. (1959). The cost of discipleship. SCM Press.
Bosch, D. J. (1991). Transforming mission: Paradigm shifts in theology of mission. Orbis Books.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press.
Casanova, J. (1994). Public religions in the modern world. University of Chicago Press.
Cone, J. H. (1970). A black theology of liberation. Lippincott.
Cone, J. H. (1975). God of the oppressed. Orbis Books.
Congar, Y. (1964). Lay people in the church. Newman Press.
Congar, Y. (2011). True and false reform in the church. Liturgical Press.
Cozzens, D. B. (2000). The changing face of the priesthood: A reflection on the priest’s crisis of soul. Liturgical Press.
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139–167.
de Lubac, H. (2006). Corpus mysticum: The Eucharist and the church in the Middle Ages. University of Notre Dame Press.
Doyle, T. P. (2006). Clericalism: Enabler of clergy sexual abuse. Pastoral Psychology, 54(3), 189–213.
Ela, J.-M. (1986). African cry. Orbis Books.
Ela, J.-M. (1988). My faith as an African. Orbis Books.
Faggioli, M. (2012). Vatican II: The battle for meaning. Paulist Press.
Faggioli, M. (2020). The liminal papacy of Pope Francis: Moving toward global Catholicity. Orbis Books.
Francis (Pope). (2013). Evangelii gaudium.
Francis (Pope). (2015). Laudato Si’.
Francis (Pope). (2018). Gaudete et exsultate.
Gifford, P. (2004). Ghana’s new Christianity: Pentecostalism in a globalising African economy. Indiana University Press.
Gifford, P. (2015). Christianity, development and modernity in Africa. Hurst.
Gutiérrez, G. (1973). A theology of liberation. Orbis Books.
Gutiérrez, G. (1984). We drink from our own wells: The spiritual journey of a people. Orbis Books.
Hanciles, J. J. (2008). Beyond Christendom: Globalization, African migration, and the transformation of the West. Orbis Books.
Jenkins, P. (2011). The next Christendom: The coming of global Christianity (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Kalu, O. (2008). African Pentecostalism: An introduction. Oxford University Press.
Kasper, W. (2004). The church and the local church. In The Petrine ministry. Paulist Press.
Kwok, P. (2005). Postcolonial imagination and feminist theology. Westminster John Knox.
Kwok, P. (2021). Postcolonial politics and theology: Unraveling empire for a global world. Westminster John Knox.
Landau, P. S. (2018). The illusion of translation: Missions, language, and the logic of African Christianity. Journal of Religion in Africa, 48(3), 221–248.
Levitt, P. (2001). The transnational villagers. University of California Press.
Luciani, R. (2022). Synodality: A new way of proceeding in the church. Paulist Press.
Mamdani, M. (1996). Citizen and subject: Contemporary Africa and the legacy of late colonialism. Princeton University Press.
Marshall, R. (2009). Political spiritualities: The Pentecostal revolution in Nigeria. University of Chicago Press.
Metz, J. B. (1980). Faith in history and society: Toward a practical fundamental theology. Crossroad.
Meyer, B. (1999). Translating the devil: Religion and modernity among the Ewe in Ghana. Edinburgh University Press.
Meyer, B. (2015). Sensational movies: Video, vision, and Christianity in Ghana. University of California Press.
Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674–697.
Meyer, I. H. (2017). Syndemic vulnerability and the health of sexual minority populations. In The Routledge Handbook of Health and Social Justice.
Moltmann, J. (1967). Theology of hope. Harper & Row.
Moltmann, J. (1974). The crucified God. Harper & Row.
Murray, S. (2004). Post-Christendom: Church and mission in a strange new world. Paternoster.
Mveng, E. (1985). L’Afrique dans l’église: Paroles d’un croyant. Éditions Clé.
Mveng, E. (1988). Anthropological poverty and the mission of the church in Africa. In Impoverishment and liberation. Orbis Books.
Newbigin, L. (1989). The gospel in a pluralist society. Eerdmans.
Oduyoye, M. A. (1995). Daughters of Anowa: African women and patriarchy. Orbis Books.
Oduyoye, M. A. (2001). Introducing African women’s theology. Sheffield Academic Press.
Ratzinger, J. (2005). Church, ecumenism, and politics. Ignatius Press.
Robert, D. L. (2009). Christian mission: How Christianity became a world religion. Wiley-Blackwell.
Sanneh, L. (1989). Translating the message: The missionary impact on culture. Orbis Books.
Sanneh, L. (2003). Whose religion is Christianity? The gospel beyond the West. Eerdmans.
Schreiter, R. J. (1997). The new catholicity: Theology between the global and the local. Orbis Books.
Second Vatican Council. (1964). Lumen gentium.
Sobrino, J. (1993). Jesus the liberator. Orbis Books.
Sobrino, J. (1994). The principle of mercy: Taking the crucified people from the cross. Orbis Books.
Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. Harvard University Press.
Volf, M. (1998). After our likeness: The church as the image of the Trinity. Eerdmans.
Walls, A. F. (1996). The missionary movement in Christian history: Studies in the transmission of faith. Orbis Books.
Walls, A. F. (2002). The cross-cultural process in Christian history. Orbis Books.
Yoder, J. H. (1994). The politics of Jesus (2nd ed.). Eerdmans.
Zizioulas, J. D. (1985). Being as communion: Studies in personhood and the church. St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press.