By Prof. Januarius Asongu

6.1 Introduction: The Return of Value in Counseling

Modern counseling theory has made significant advances in understanding cognition, behavior, emotion, and relational dynamics. Yet one of its most persistent limitations lies in its uneasy relationship with value and meaning. While some traditions—particularly humanistic and existential approaches—have foregrounded these dimensions, much of contemporary practice remains cautious, often avoiding explicit engagement with normative questions.

This caution is understandable. The diversity of cultural, moral, and philosophical perspectives in contemporary society makes it difficult to establish a shared framework for evaluating values. As a result, counseling often adopts a stance of neutrality, emphasizing client autonomy and subjective well-being without articulating a broader account of what constitutes human flourishing.

However, as numerous scholars have observed, this neutrality is neither fully sustainable nor entirely desirable. Viktor Frankl argued that the search for meaning is a primary motivational force in human life, and that the absence of meaning leads to what he termed “existential vacuum” (Frankl, 1963). Similarly, Alasdair MacIntyre has critiqued modern moral discourse for its fragmentation, arguing that the loss of coherent value frameworks undermines both individual and communal life (MacIntyre, 1981).

Within counseling, the consequences of this axiological ambiguity are evident. Clients often present not only with symptoms, but with deeper questions about purpose, direction, and the value of their lives. Without a framework for engaging these questions, counseling risks addressing surface-level issues while leaving underlying sources of distress unresolved.

Critical Synthetic Realism (CSR) addresses this limitation by reintroducing axiology—the study of value—as a central component of its framework. It does so not by imposing a rigid moral system, but by articulating a structured account of how values function within the multi-domain reality of human existence. This chapter develops that account, showing how values, meaning, and purpose are integral to both the experience of distress and the process of restoration.

6.2 The Axiological Domain in CSR

Within CSR, the axiological domain refers to the dimension of reality concerned with value, meaning, and purpose. It encompasses the judgments individuals make about what is good, desirable, or worthwhile, as well as the orientations that guide their actions.

This domain is not reducible to subjective preference. While values are experienced and expressed by individuals, they are also shaped by broader conditions, including cultural traditions, relational contexts, and the structure of reality itself. As such, the axiological domain occupies a position between objectivity and subjectivity. It is neither entirely imposed nor entirely constructed.

This position distinguishes CSR from two dominant approaches to value. On one side are subjectivist accounts, which treat values as expressions of individual preference or emotion. While such accounts respect autonomy, they struggle to provide criteria for evaluating competing values. On the other side are objectivist accounts, which treat values as fixed and universal, often independent of context. While these accounts provide stability, they may fail to account for the diversity and dynamism of human experience.

CSR navigates between these extremes by understanding values as emergent within the structure of Conditional Reality. They are grounded in the conditions that support human flourishing, yet they are interpreted and enacted within specific contexts. This allows for both normative evaluation and contextual sensitivity.

6.3 Meaning as Interpretive Integration

Meaning, within CSR, is not a static property of events, but the result of interpretive integration. Individuals make sense of their experiences by situating them within broader frameworks that connect past, present, and future. These frameworks are shaped by both epistemic processes (interpretation) and axiological orientations (value).

This understanding aligns with the work of Viktor Frankl, who emphasized that meaning is discovered rather than invented, arising from engagement with the conditions of life (Frankl, 1963). It also resonates with Paul Ricoeur’s account of narrative identity, in which meaning emerges through the integration of events into a coherent story (Ricoeur, 1984).

CSR extends these insights by situating meaning within the multi-domain structure of reality. Meaning is not merely a function of interpretation; it is shaped by the interaction of ontological conditions, relational contexts, and value commitments. A narrative that provides meaning must therefore achieve a degree of alignment across domains.

For example, a career choice may be meaningful if it aligns with an individual’s values (axiological), fits within their relational context (structural), corresponds to their abilities and opportunities (ontological), and is coherently understood within their narrative (epistemic). When these elements are misaligned, meaning may be compromised.

6.4 Teleology and the Orientation of Human Life

The concept of teleology—the orientation toward ends or purposes—is central to CSR’s account of value. Human beings do not merely act; they act with reference to goals, whether explicitly articulated or implicitly assumed. These goals provide direction and coherence, shaping decisions and organizing experience.

Aristotelian philosophy, particularly in the work of Aristotle, has long emphasized the importance of teleology in understanding human life. Aristotle’s concept of eudaimonia, often translated as flourishing, refers to the fulfillment of human potential through the realization of virtue (Aristotle, trans. 2009). While CSR does not adopt this framework in a strictly classical form, it shares the insight that human life is oriented toward certain forms of fulfillment.

Modern thought has often been skeptical of teleological accounts, associating them with metaphysical assumptions that are difficult to justify. However, the absence of teleology creates its own difficulties. Without a sense of purpose, individuals may struggle to organize their lives or evaluate their choices. This is evident in the existential concerns addressed by thinkers such as Frankl and Rollo May, who highlighted the importance of meaning and purpose in psychological well-being (May, 1953).

CSR reintroduces teleology in a qualified and integrated form. It does not posit a single, predetermined end for all individuals, but recognizes that human life is oriented toward forms of flourishing that emerge from the alignment of domains. Purpose is therefore both discovered and constructed, shaped by the interaction of values, conditions, and interpretations.

6.5 The Fragmentation of Value in Modern Counseling

The broader epistemic fracture discussed in earlier chapters extends into the domain of value. Just as knowledge has become fragmented across disciplines, so too has moral and axiological understanding. This fragmentation is evident in the coexistence of diverse and often conflicting value systems, without a shared framework for integration.

Within counseling, this fragmentation manifests as axiological ambiguity. Practitioners may avoid engaging directly with questions of value, focusing instead on helping clients achieve their own goals. While this approach respects autonomy, it can limit the depth of counseling, particularly when clients’ goals are themselves sources of distress.

MacIntyre (1981) has argued that modern moral discourse is characterized by a loss of coherence, in which moral claims are expressed without a shared basis for evaluation. This condition is reflected in counseling, where the absence of a normative framework can make it difficult to address conflicts between values or to evaluate the adequacy of particular goals.

CSR addresses this challenge by providing a framework for understanding value in relation to the structure of reality. It does not eliminate diversity, but offers criteria for evaluating values based on their capacity to support alignment and flourishing.

The preceding section has established the centrality of the axiological domain within CSR, developing a framework for understanding value, meaning, and purpose. It has engaged key thinkers in philosophy and psychology, situating CSR within a broader intellectual tradition while articulating its distinctive contribution.

6.6 When Values Fracture the Self

If Part I established that values, meaning, and purpose are central to human existence, then a critical question follows: What happens when these values are disordered, fragmented, or misaligned? The answer, within the framework of Critical Synthetic Realism (CSR), is that value misalignment constitutes a primary source of psychological and existential suffering.

While traditional counseling models often focus on cognitive distortions, emotional dysregulation, or relational conflict, they frequently treat values as secondary or implicit. CSR reverses this orientation by recognizing that values are not peripheral, but structurally central. They shape interpretation, guide action, and orient the individual toward particular ends. When values are misaligned—either internally or in relation to other domains—distress emerges not merely as a symptom, but as a manifestation of deeper incoherence.

This section develops a systematic account of value misalignment, showing how it interacts with epistemic, structural, and ontological dimensions to produce suffering. It also engages broader philosophical and psychological perspectives, demonstrating that CSR’s account both integrates and extends existing insights.

6.7 Forms of Axiological Misalignment

Value misalignment can take several forms, each reflecting a different kind of incoherence within or across domains. While these forms are analytically distinct, they often occur in combination, creating complex patterns of distress.

6.7.1 Internal Axiological Conflict

One of the most common forms of misalignment occurs within the axiological domain itself. Individuals may hold conflicting values that cannot be simultaneously realized. For example, a person may value both professional success and family presence, yet find that the demands of one undermine the other.

Such conflicts are not merely practical dilemmas; they reflect deeper tensions in the structure of value. Without a framework for prioritization or integration, individuals may experience persistent anxiety, indecision, or guilt. This aligns with the observations of Rollo May, who emphasized that anxiety often arises from conflicts between competing values and possibilities (May, 1953).

CSR interprets these conflicts as a failure of axiological integration. The task is not simply to choose between values, but to understand their relationship and to reconfigure them in a way that restores coherence.

6.7.2 Axiological–Epistemic Misalignment

A second form of misalignment occurs when values are not coherently integrated with interpretation. Individuals may espouse certain values while interpreting their experiences in ways that undermine those values.

For example, a client may value trust and connection, yet interpret others’ actions as hostile or rejecting, leading to withdrawal or defensiveness. The resulting behavior contradicts the stated value, creating a cycle of frustration and disconnection.

This form of misalignment highlights the interplay between the axiological and epistemic domains. Values require interpretive support; without it, they cannot effectively guide action. Conversely, interpretations are shaped by values, influencing how events are perceived and evaluated.

CSR addresses this issue by emphasizing the need for alignment between value and interpretation. Counseling must therefore engage both domains, helping clients develop interpretations that support their values while critically examining the values themselves.

6.7.3 Axiological–Structural Misalignment

Another significant form of misalignment arises when an individual’s values are incompatible with the structures within which they live. These structures may include family systems, workplace environments, cultural norms, or institutional constraints.

For instance, a person who values autonomy and creativity may experience distress in a highly controlled organizational setting. Similarly, an individual who values community and relational depth may struggle in environments characterized by competition and individualism.

Such misalignment often produces feelings of alienation, dissatisfaction, or burnout. Importantly, this distress cannot be reduced to internal dysfunction. It reflects a genuine tension between the individual and their environment.

This perspective aligns with insights from critical and social psychology, including the work of Erich Fromm, who argued that modern social structures can produce forms of alienation that undermine human well-being (Fromm, 1941). CSR incorporates this insight while situating it within a multi-domain framework, recognizing that structural conditions interact with epistemic and axiological processes.

6.7.4 Axiological–Ontological Misalignment

A further form of misalignment occurs when values are oriented toward goals that are incompatible with the conditions of reality. For example, an individual may pursue ideals that are unattainable given their circumstances, leading to chronic frustration or a sense of failure.

This type of misalignment highlights the importance of the ontological domain. Values must be grounded in the conditions of existence if they are to be realized. When they are not, individuals may experience a persistent gap between aspiration and reality.

At the same time, this form of misalignment is not always a matter of error. It may also reflect structural limitations that constrain the realization of values. In such cases, the task of counseling may involve not only adjusting expectations, but also exploring ways to transform or navigate these constraints.

6.8 The Experience of Value-Based Suffering

The various forms of axiological misalignment converge in the lived experience of suffering. This suffering is not reducible to discrete symptoms; it often manifests as a diffuse sense of disorientation, dissatisfaction, or loss of meaning.

Viktor Frankl described this condition as an “existential vacuum,” characterized by a lack of purpose and direction (Frankl, 1963). Similarly, Irvin Yalom identified existential concerns—such as meaninglessness, isolation, and freedom—as central to human distress (Yalom, 1980).

CSR situates these experiences within the broader framework of misalignment. Meaninglessness, for example, can be understood as a failure of integration between values and other domains. When individuals cannot connect their values to their interpretations, relationships, or conditions of life, meaning becomes fragmented.

This perspective provides a more structured account of existential suffering, linking it to specific patterns of misalignment. It also suggests that restoration requires more than the affirmation of meaning; it requires the reconfiguration of the relationships between domains.

6.9 Value, Power, and Social Context

An important dimension of axiological analysis concerns the role of power and social context in shaping values. Values are not formed in a vacuum; they are influenced by cultural norms, institutional structures, and systems of power.

The work of Michel Foucault highlights how knowledge and power are intertwined, shaping what is considered true, normal, or desirable (Foucault, 1972). Similarly, critical theorists have emphasized the ways in which social structures can reinforce certain values while marginalizing others.

CSR acknowledges these influences while maintaining a commitment to the possibility of evaluation. While values are shaped by context, they are not entirely determined by it. Individuals retain the capacity to reflect on and revise their values, guided by the principle of correctability.

This perspective allows CSR to engage critically with social and cultural factors without collapsing into relativism. It recognizes that some values may be misaligned not only with individual flourishing, but with the broader conditions that support human well-being.

6.10 Implications for Counseling Practice

The analysis of value misalignment has significant implications for counseling. It suggests that effective practice must engage not only cognitive and relational dimensions, but also the axiological structure of the client’s life.

This involves several key tasks. First, counselors must help clients articulate their values, bringing implicit commitments into explicit awareness. Second, they must facilitate the examination of these values in relation to other domains, identifying patterns of misalignment. Third, they must support the reconfiguration of values in ways that promote coherence and alignment.

This process requires sensitivity and care. Values are often deeply held and closely tied to identity. Challenging them can evoke strong emotional responses. As such, the counselor must balance critical engagement with respect for the client’s autonomy and context.

The preceding section has developed a comprehensive account of value misalignment as a central source of human suffering. It has shown how conflicts within and across domains generate distress, and how these patterns are shaped by both individual and social factors.

6.11 Reframing the Aim of Counseling

If distress has been shown to arise from misalignment across domains, then the positive aim of counseling must be understood as the restoration of alignment. Yet alignment alone requires further specification: alignment toward what end? What constitutes a life that is not merely free from distress, but meaningful, coherent, and sustainable?

Within Critical Synthetic Realism (CSR), the answer to this question is found in the concept of human flourishing. Flourishing provides the axiological horizon within which alignment acquires direction and purpose. It is not a single outcome or state, but a structured condition in which the multiple dimensions of human life—ontological, epistemic, structural, and axiological—are integrated in ways that support the full development of the person.

This section develops the concept of flourishing as integration, engages major philosophical and psychological accounts, and clarifies how this vision grounds counseling practice.

6.12 Flourishing as Multi-Domain Integration

Within CSR, flourishing is defined as the progressive integration of domains in alignment with the conditions of reality and the pursuit of meaningful value commitments. This definition brings together the central elements developed in previous chapters.

At the ontological level, flourishing involves an effective engagement with the conditions of existence. Individuals recognize constraints and possibilities, adapting to them in ways that sustain life and enable action.

At the epistemic level, flourishing involves the development of interpretations that are increasingly adequate and coherent. Individuals are able to understand their experiences in ways that support effective engagement with reality.

At the structural level, flourishing involves participation in relational and institutional contexts that support well-being. Relationships are characterized by mutual recognition and cooperation, and social structures are navigated in ways that enable agency.

At the axiological level, flourishing involves the articulation and enactment of values that provide direction and meaning. Individuals pursue goals that are not only desirable, but coherent with their understanding and context.

What distinguishes CSR is the insistence that these dimensions are interdependent. Flourishing is not achieved by optimizing one domain in isolation, but by integrating them into a coherent whole. This integration is dynamic, requiring ongoing adjustment as conditions change.

6.13 Dialogue with Classical and Contemporary Accounts

The concept of flourishing has a long history in philosophical thought, most notably in the Aristotelian tradition. Aristotle’s notion of eudaimonia describes flourishing as the realization of human potential through the cultivation of virtue (Aristotle, trans. 2009). While CSR shares the emphasis on fulfillment and coherence, it differs in its multi-domain structure, which explicitly integrates epistemic and structural dimensions alongside virtue.

In modern psychology, positive psychology has sought to operationalize flourishing through constructs such as well-being, engagement, and meaning (Seligman, 2011). These approaches provide valuable empirical insights, yet they often treat these elements as aggregative rather than integrative. CSR complements this work by emphasizing the relationships between domains, suggesting that well-being arises not from the accumulation of positive states, but from their alignment.

Existential and humanistic thinkers, including Viktor Frankl and Carl Rogers, have emphasized the importance of meaning and authenticity in flourishing (Frankl, 1963; Rogers, 1957). CSR incorporates these insights while situating them within a broader framework that includes structural and ontological considerations.

By engaging these traditions, CSR positions itself as both continuous with and corrective of existing accounts. It affirms the importance of meaning, virtue, and well-being, while providing a more comprehensive structure for understanding how these elements interact.

6.14 Flourishing and the Resolution of Misalignment

The relationship between misalignment and flourishing is central to CSR’s axiological framework. Misalignment, as developed in earlier sections, represents a condition in which domains are incoherent or mutually undermining. Flourishing, by contrast, represents the resolution of these misalignments through integration.

This resolution is not absolute or permanent. Human life is characterized by change, uncertainty, and limitation. As such, alignment must be continually re-established. Flourishing is therefore best understood as a trajectory rather than a fixed state—a movement toward greater coherence over time.

This perspective has important implications for counseling. It suggests that the goal of therapy is not to achieve a final state of perfection, but to support clients in developing the capacity for ongoing alignment. This includes the ability to recognize misalignments, engage in correctability, and reconfigure relationships between domains.

6.15 The Ethical Dimension of Counseling

The concept of flourishing introduces an explicitly ethical dimension to counseling. While many contemporary approaches seek to avoid normative commitments, CSR argues that such commitments are unavoidable. Every counseling intervention implicitly promotes certain values, whether acknowledged or not.

CSR makes this dimension explicit by grounding counseling in the pursuit of alignment and flourishing. This does not entail imposing a specific set of values on clients, but it does involve evaluating values in relation to their coherence and their capacity to support integration.

This approach aligns with the view that counseling is not morally neutral, but involves guiding clients toward more adequate ways of living. At the same time, it respects the diversity of individual contexts, recognizing that flourishing may take different forms depending on circumstances.

6.16 Implications for Counseling Practice

The axiological framework developed here has direct implications for counseling practice. It suggests that effective counseling must engage clients at the level of value and meaning, not merely as an adjunct to other interventions, but as a central component of the process.

This involves helping clients clarify their values, examine their coherence with other domains, and align their actions accordingly. It also involves supporting clients in navigating structural conditions that may constrain the realization of their values.

Importantly, this process must be integrated with the epistemological and ontological dimensions developed in previous chapters. Values cannot be considered in isolation; they must be understood in relation to interpretation, reality, and relational context.

6.17 Transition to Critical Synthetic Counseling (CSC)

With the development of ontology (Chapter 4), epistemology (Chapter 5), and axiology (Chapter 6), the philosophical foundation of Critical Synthetic Realism is now complete. These elements provide the conceptual basis for a comprehensive approach to counseling.

The next stage of the argument is to translate this foundation into a structured model of practice—Critical Synthetic Counseling (CSC). CSC operationalizes the principles of CSR, providing a framework for assessment, intervention, and evaluation that is grounded in the concepts of misalignment, correctability, and alignment.

6.18 Conclusion 

This chapter has articulated the axiological dimension of Critical Synthetic Realism, developing a comprehensive account of value, meaning, and human flourishing. It has shown that flourishing is best understood as the integration of domains, and that misalignment is a primary source of suffering.

By engaging classical and contemporary accounts, CSR has been positioned as a framework that both integrates and extends existing approaches. It provides a normative foundation for counseling, guiding practice toward the restoration of alignment and the pursuit of flourishing.

References

Aristotle. (2009). Nicomachean ethics (W. D. Ross, Trans.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published ca. 350 BCE)

Asongu, J. (2026a). The splendor of truth: A critical philosophy of knowledge and global agency. Wipf & Stock.

Asongu, J. (2026b). Critical synthetic realism: A systematic philosophy of reality, knowledge, and human flourishing. Generis Publishing.

Frankl, V. E. (1963). Man’s search for meaning. Beacon Press.

Fromm, E. (1941). Escape from freedom. Farrar & Rinehart.

MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue. University of Notre Dame Press.

May, R. (1953). Man’s search for himself. Norton.

Ricoeur, P. (1984). Time and narrative (Vol. 1). University of Chicago Press.

Rogers, C. R. (1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21(2), 95–103.

Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish. Free Press.

Yalom, I. D. (1980). Existential psychotherapy. Basic Books.